In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy should tobacco products be banned persuasive essay prefer. Customers would decide-without the government’s help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. When the government starts telling restaurant owners what their customers can and cannot do, the government is overstepping its boundaries. Our government aims to protect us-to save us from society’s evils.
Congressional Research Service in 1994, “the statistical evidence does not . According to the California Licensed Beverage Association, business has dropped as much as 85 percent . The decrease in customers and subsequent loss of revenue has far-reaching effects on employers. A study by the American Beverage Institute entitled “Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs” asked 300 respondents about the effects of the ban on their businesses. When asked if the ban caused owners to lay off employees or cut working hours, 29. Disruption, Lost Revenues, and Customer Dissatisfaction. National Review 28 July 1997:28-30.
National Review 20 April 1998:63. Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs. Ruwart: Libertarians on Smoking Bans. Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly. During the past few decades it has come to light that smoking kills. The federal government mandates that every pack of cigarettes carry a warning on it that smoking can lead to health problems including death.
Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy. Smoking is a danger to one’s own health but there is now evidence that smoking can affect others as well. Second hand smoke has been shown to cause cancer. I cannot stand walking down a street behind someone who is smoking. It also affects my health. Do you mind people smoking around you in public places.